Sunday, November 11, 2012
Friday, November 2, 2012
Studying the Usability of iPads: How Easy is it?
Background Information on the Testing
The Overall Findings of the Study
The Problem with Apps
One thing I found particularly interesting in the study was the findings on the inconsistencies in the design of iPad specific apps. There are about 700,000 apps for the iPhone however, iPad specific apps are still fairly new with only about 200,000. As a result there are a lot of discrepancies between app designs and for users this presents a big problem. For example on four different apps double tapping a picture resulted in it either getting larger, hyperlinking to a new page, flipping to a new picture, opening a navigation bar, or having nothing happen. Another example of confusing graphical interfaces would be in the swipe motions associated with iPads. On many apps swiping left takes you for example to the next page of the article, whereas on other apps swiping left takes you to a entirely different article.Another finding was a problem that often arose when maps were included on pages of apps or websites. On the Stanford University website there is a page with a map of the university on it. When users tried to zoom in on the map using the well known multi-touch gesture of pinching the entire web page zoomed instead of just the map retracting greatly from the usability function of the website. Finally one of this biggest complaints was the vast differences between apps and their website counterparts. For example with both the eBay and Gap app many items did not show up when searched for. In addition there were less choices for specialization when searching for exact products, when iPad when searched in the eBay app many off topic items showed up such as cases and accessories. These misconceptions are also compounded by the fact that many apps have hidden usability functions that are not readily apparent to the user. With so many differences between apps on the iPad it makes usability very confusing.
The Importance of the Findings
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Mind The Gap: Mobile Devices in Politics
Looking at differences between the digital divide and participation gap
Although both the digital divide and participation gaps are problems in an always evolving technological world, I believe currently in the U.S, we are far more influenced by the latter, that being participatory gaps. The digital divide focuses more on the inequality of ownership of internet ready devices whereas the participation gap bases it's theory around the fact that there are discrepancies with the comfort level and ability people have with different technologies. However the participation gap is a direct result of the digital divide. In my mind about 4 years ago there was a clear digital divide, and although we may have been able to bridge the inequality for the most part as a result of less experience a participation gap is now clearly evident.
Voter data is helping to show a decrease in the digital divide
Guidry utilizes the examples of a lack of computer ownership in minorities specifically Latino's and African Americans as well as illustrating the point that close to a third of college students still don't have a personal computer. However, this data is somewhat dated and according to more recent findings done by the Pew Research Center on mobile data and politics I would be more inclined to say that America has evolved from the digital divide and is now facing a participatory gap. The data which polled over a 1000 voters of different political and demographic backgrounds came back with a findings that 88% of voters had a cellphone of some sort and about 50% had smartphones. In fact democratic voters who usually include more of the minority had a higher percentage of smartphone ownership that those affiliated with the republican party.
American voters help illustrate participatory gaps in American smartphone users
The biggest differences in the study where seen when the data was broken down into different demographics which showed that the those aged 18-49 and those who had received college educations were both more likely to use their smartphone for election related uses out of all voters who had smartphones. To me this illustrates that there is a clear difference in the ease of use of technology. A younger audience and those who have received college educations have probably had more interaction with these technologies and as a result also use them in ways past their basic uses that someone less technologically proficient would not be able to.
What's in store for the future
If the market for mobile devices continues the way it currently is then we could see the digital divide almost disappearing completely resulting in a shortening of the participation gap. As technology continues to improve there are more and more smartphones that are becoming cheaper in fact most large carriers have internet ready phones free when you get a contract. Currently these smartphones are becoming more accessible and in the next 3 to 5 years if more and more people have access to these devices the participation gap should being to shrink. Overall I think we can expect to see a tangible increase in mobile audiences across america in the coming years.
Friday, October 5, 2012
However now that this has become commonplace more potential employees are taking actions to strengthen their privacy and maintain a clear separation between their personal and professional lives. Much to the dismay of more and more employers have begun to demand employee's to befriend HR reps and take down privacy settings, or in some more extreme cases even demand the password to there social networks. I could not even believe that this was even legal but also a commonplace throughout the country. Employers were essentially making you choose between your right to privacy and your livelihood.
In a recent case the Maryland Department of Corrections asked an employee for his Facebook password to verify that an extended leave of absence was actually due to a death in his family. Orin Kerr a George Washington University professor summed it up saying, "it would be akin to asking someone the keys to their house." Luckily as a result of this Maryland Legislatures passed a bill prohibiting employers from asking you for your password. In addition other states such as Illinois have followed suit. What still shocks me is that in Facebook's terms of service its clearly stated that the site forbids, "anyone from soliciting the login information or accessing an account belonging to someone else." Hopefully more states will follow Maryland's lead and being to crack down on employers. The last thing employee's should have to choose between is job security and Facebook security.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)